I don’t like the 1911. Rather, I do not like what society has made of it.
The 38s we brought to the Philippines was underwhelming and left the military in a rush to switch back to its long-time 45. Bureaucratic manners progressing as they do, the decision was made to design a whole new cartridge out of a desire to go back to a proven old cartridge because of the failure of a new cartridge… Okay. The 45 ACP was born.
Mr. Browning submitted a new pistol design to the military with no safeties in a bid for new cavalry pistols. The most rapidly dying service in the military bidding for the newest pistols. O…kay. Concerns about the possibility of troopers shooting themselves and their mounts arose, so Mr. Browning was instructed to put a safety into his new design. The deed was done, and properly. Shortly after, the Army had its new pistol.
No one in command seemed to think that the new pistol should be loaded. The designer, himself, evidently agreed, having never bothered to put a safety in the original design. For the rest of the weapon’s tenure in active service, it was carried unloaded as any other SAO in world service has been. It bearers were given fairly decent pistol instruction for the age: draw, chamber a round, point the pistol at the Hun, and fire instinctively. It bears mention that Fairbairn and Sykes were cutting edge in their methods of pistol craft in this age: SEVERAL positions from which to point shoot, standardized methods for pointing consistently, regular and progressively more demanding qualification, improving visibility of front sights on the rare occasions they would be used, and pinning the safety the Army so demanded.
What does this make of the 1911? A large-bore horse pistol pressed into general use as a general service sidearm. Its design and use were thoroughly average for the doctrines of the age. To be specific: single-stack, to be carried unloaded, given safeties as a backup to routine unloading, sights as a backup to instinctive pointing, and a grip meant to be held however the user felt comfortable. Not a high grip, that was still not a thing. It was unique in its design: the caliber was pretty large in an auto-loader, the feeding/extraction system was new and worked very well, and both of the safeties (despite being afterthoughts) were placed with care. In all, the 1911 was a very high-end SAO of the day and a prime example of early-century arms development.
The Army proceeded to train new servicemen in the use of the new pistol. As trainers must do, they touted its supremacy on the battlefield, the ability of its bullet to put the enemy down, and it reliability. These men were mostly introduced to the 1911 before any other handgun or at least auto-loader. They left service familiar and comfortable with it, desiring one of their own. All well and good, until they wanted to improve the system.
The hammer was an obstacle in developing a high grip. It had to be modified, and eventually the grip safety to insure success. The sights had to be improved, the feed system had to be tweaked to accept the hollow point coming into regular use. It was decided that a working pistol ought to be carried loaded and luckily, the shoe-horned safeties proved capable once enlarged. Should it have a firing pin block? One mucks up the trigger? Pull it and try a lighter firing pin?
The introduction of a new, double-stack, small caliber, easy to take down, DA/SA pistol that was designed and intended to be carried loaded left an understandably bad taste in the mouths of the men who had grown up in training that taught them unloaded large caliber weapons were the way to go.
The 1911 is held as the finest combat arm ever devised to this day. An arm so beautiful in design that it can keep relevant in the modern world.
No. The 1911 is an old pistol that has been sporterized. It could not handle modern service and has been forcibly molded into something useful enough in it new life. And the standardization of a tilting chamber during the loading cycle is its legacy. Its bearers are better armed than those one hundred years ago, but modern, they are not.